Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
kb:wiener_filtering [2021-05-05 01:02] – ↷ Page moved from kb:ee:wiener_filtering to kb:wiener_filtering jaeyoung | kb:wiener_filtering [2024-04-30 04:03] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== Wiener | + | ====== Wiener |
+ | |||
+ | ===== Unconstrained Wiener filter | ||
Wiener filtering allows us to estimate the value of one wide-sense stationary random process from measurements of another WSS random process that is jointly WSS. | Wiener filtering allows us to estimate the value of one wide-sense stationary random process from measurements of another WSS random process that is jointly WSS. | ||
- | Essentially, | + | Essentially, |
+ | |||
+ | $$ \hat{y} [n] = \mu_y + \sum_{j = 0}^{L-1} h[j] \underbrace{(x[n-j] - \mu_x)}_{\tilde{x}[n-j]} $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is equivalent to $x$ convolved with $h$, an FIR filter: | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ \hat{y}[n] = (h \ast x)[n] $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | This FIR filter $h[\cdot]$ satisfies: | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ (h \ast C_{xx})[m] = C_{yx}[m], \forall m $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the frequency domain, this can be rewritten as: | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ H(e^{j\Omega}) = \frac{D_{yx}(e^{j\Omega})}{D_{xx}(e^{j\Omega})} $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is the frequency response of the unconstrainted Wiener filter - that is, $x[n]$ for all $n$ can be used. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Mean square error of unconstrained Wiener filter ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} \left(D_{yy}(e^{j\Omega}) - \frac{|D_{yx}(e^{j\Omega})|^2}{D_{xx}(e^{j\Omega})}\right) d\Omega $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Causal Wiener filter ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | A causal Wiener filter allows us to predict future values of a random process $y[\cdot]$ given past values of a related process $x[\cdot]$. | ||
+ | |||
+ | To do this, we can create a model for $x[\cdot]$ that states that it is a filtered version of a white random process: | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ x[n] = (f \ast w)[n] $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here, $w[\cdot]$ is a white random process with unit intensity, and $f[\cdot]$ is the unit sample response of a stable, causal system whose inverse is also stable and causal. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Given this model, we know that: | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ R_{xx} = f \ast \overleftarrow{f} $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | (where $\overleftarrow{f}$ is the time-reversed version of $f$) | ||
+ | |||
+ | The PSD of $x$ can be written as: | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ S_{xx}(z) = F(z)F(z^{-1}) $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The transfer function of the causal Wiener filter is: | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ H(z) = \frac{1}{F(z)} \left[ \frac{D_{yx}(z)}{F(z^{-1})} \right]_+ $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | where the plus sign $+$ in the subscript denotes that only the causal components of the transfer function are included. In other words, any positive powers of $z$ inside the brackets are discarded. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the special case of using past values of a process $x[n]$ to predict a future value $x[n+m]$: | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ H(z) = \frac{1}{F(z)} \left[ \frac{z^m F(z) F(z^{-1})}{F(z^{-1})} \right]_+ = \frac{1}{F(z)} \left[ z^m F(z) \right]_+ $$ | ||
+ | ==== MMSE of causal Wiener filter ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ MMSE = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} \left( D_{yy}(e^{j\Omega}) - H(e^{j\Omega})D_{xy}(e^{j\Omega}) - H(e^{-j\Omega})D_{yx}(e^{j\Omega}) + |H(e^{j\Omega})|^2 D_{xx}(e^{j\Omega}) \right) d\Omega $$ |